1. <li id="7h04j"><acronym id="7h04j"></acronym></li>
      <dd id="7h04j"><pre id="7h04j"></pre></dd>

      1. <rp id="7h04j"><acronym id="7h04j"></acronym></rp>

          We

          Our services

          SCC Agents

          As your Supreme Court of nada agent, we take re of technil review, hard copy and electronic production, corresponding with the Registrar, service and filing, and advising on the Court’s unique practices.

          l

          Written Submissions

          We ghostwrite factums at all court levels. It’s not enough to simply reargue what was said at trial. We work with clients to craft the most persuasive and strategic arguments geared towards appellate judges.

          i

          Research and Opinions

          Make an informed decision about the next step in your se with an opinion on its strengths and weaknesses. If you’re already preparing submissions, we’ll ensure you have the latest legal research.

          Courts of Appeal

          Whether it’s an appeal at the Supreme Court or before a lower court of appeal, we work with clients or their lawyers to put their best se forward.

          Our team

          Eugene Meehan, Q.C.

          Eugene Meehan, Q.C.

          Partner

          Marie-France Major

          Marie-France Major

          Partner

          Thomas Slade

          Thomas Slade

          Partner

          Cory Giordano

          Cory Giordano

          Partner

          Get in touch

          Visit

          340 Gilmour St., Suite 100
          Ottawa, Ontario K2P 0R3

          ll or Email

          Tel: 613-695-8855
          Fax: 613-695-8580

          emeehan@

          Social Media

          Join the conversation

          Our Newsletter

          Stay up-to-date with
          our free e-newsletters

          Latest news

          Equitable Remedies for Tax Mistakes

          Equitable Remedies for Tax Mistakes

          On Friday, June 17, 2022, the Supreme Court of nada is releasing its decision in Collins Family Trust v. nada (Attorney General). At issue is the availability of the equitable remedy of rescission to unwind transactions that gave rise to unintended tax consequences.

          read more
          | |